Schmidt born june 16, 1961 is a german economist who currently works as professor of economics at the university of munich lmu. Schmidt there is strong evidence that people exploit their bargaining power in competitive markets but not in bilateral bargaining situations. Formal models of inequity aversion such as those by fehr and. More recently, several papers have estimated fehr schmidt inequity aversion parameters using estimation techniques such as maximum likelihood. Direct tests of models of social preferences and a new model. In the first step, subjects play selected games in order to estimate their individual. The quarterly journal of economics 114 3, 817868, 1999. These models have been widely applied to data in the past and continue to be applied in current literature chen and li, 2009. Course in behavioral and experimental economics c m. This paper shows that reciprocity has powerful implications for many economic domains. When this work was published most economic models routinely assumed that material selfinterest is the sole motivation of all people engaging in economic activities.
Inequity aversion and individual behavior in public good games. Fehr, ernst and klaus schmidt 1999 a theory of fairness, competition, and. Dominance concepts for fehrschmidt preferences sanjit dhamiy ali alnowaihiz 30 may 20 abstract many diverse problems in economics can only be reasonably explained by assuming that people have social preferences, i. Advances in economics and econometrics, econometric society. Fehr and schmidt fs introduced an influential social utility function for individuals in interpersonal contexts that captures selfcentered inequity aversion.
If he tries, you can just pick someone elses offer. Does peer group size influence social preferences and risk. A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation author. A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation authors. Theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation the quarterly. For example, persons in a flood plain may be less likely to purchase flood insurance if their neighbors also refrain from purchasing. Implicit power motivation moderates mens testosterone responses to imagined and real dominance success, hormones and behavior, n. In such models fairness considerations or preferences for cooperation dont play a role when. Fehr and schmidt 1999 even a minority of inequality averse subjects may have powerful effects on the outcome of strategic interactions. An extention of the model of inequity aversion by fehr and schmidt. Schmidt 1999 model to allow the intensity of the social preferences to vary with the size of the peer group. Are people inequality averse, and do they prefer redistribution by the state.
The classical notions of first and second order stochastic dominance are not useful in this case. In this paper we reply to binmore and shakeds criticism of the fehr schmidt model of inequity aversion. How do people with social preferences choose among alternative income distributions. Fehr and schmidt 1999 predicts multiple equilibria in only 6% of all randomlyformed groups in my threeplayer setup, which contrasts with an observed 38%. Rabin 1993, fehr and schmidt 1999 predict that some principals are fairminded and thus refrain from exploiting their agents even in treatment random. A preference foundation for fehr and schmidts model. Theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation the. The theory of inequity aversion fehr and schmidt, 1999 was developed to solve a puzzle. Pdf the economics of fairness, reciprocity and altruism.
A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation ernst fehr. A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation ernst fehr and klaus m. Thus, even if it were true that in general 2 the inequity aversion approach by fehr and schmidt is compatible with the evidence in several other. Treatment variations provide evidence on how the observed equilibrium sets vary with changes in the experimental parameters. Dominance concepts for discrete fehrschmidt preferences. Fairness and reciprocity jonathan levin june 2006 beyond the fact that laboratory play does not correspond to notions of equilibrium, many laboratory results seem strikingly at odds with the. A conditional form of altruism andor envy is inequity aversion fehr and schmidt 1999, bolton and ockenfels 2000, charness and rabin 2002. Inequality aversion, efficiency, and maximin preferences. The quarterly journal of economics, august 1999, 817868 working paper no. Theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation oxford. Social preferences i and ii martin kocher university of munich. The value of this social utility function lies in its exceptionally good balance between parsimony and fit. Fehr and schmidt 1999, even a minority of inequalityaverse subjects may have powerful effects on the outcome of strategic interactions.
There is also strong evidence that people exploit freeriding opportunities in voluntary cooperation games. Valderrama beatriz motivacion inteligente pdf free download. Inequality, inequity aversion, and the provision of public goods. Fehr e schmidt k m 1999 a theory of fairness competition.
Schmidtb university of munich and cepr published in. Pdf a theory of fairness, competition and cooperation. The perfect correlation between the alpha and beta parameters in fehr and schmidt 1999 is an assumption made in the appendix of their paper that is not justified by the data that they provide. For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription. A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Effects of affiliation and power motivation arousal on salivary progesterone and. It is an important determinant in the enforcement of contracts and social norms and. A read is counted each time someone views a publication summary such as the title, abstract, and list of authors, clicks on a figure, or views or downloads the fulltext. Rohde2 january 12, 2009 1the author would like to thank itzhak gilboa, ingrid m. Schmidt 1999 or bolton and ockenfels 2000 have been quite successful in explaining patterns. There is strong evidence that people exploit their. On inequity aversion a reply to binmore and shaked ernst fehr a university of zurich klaus m. Theories of fairness and reciprocity evidence and economic applications. Schmidt b university of munich february 4, 2009 abstract.
A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation, the quarterly journal of economics, 114 3, aug, pp 817868 schwarze j. Third party punishment and social norms ernst fehr and urs fischbacher january 2004 published in. Yet, when they are given the opportunity to punish freeriders, stable cooperation is maintained although punishment is costly for those. His research focuses on behavioural economics, game theory and contract theory. Given a group of l agents, the fehr schmidt utility function of agent i is.
An experimental investigation astrid dannenberg, thomas riechmann, bodo sturm, and carsten vogt. We find stronger evidence for the models predictive power at the individual level than what the existing literature suggests. The aim of our paper is to answer this question in the context of the fehr schmidt 1999 preferences. Inequity aversion, welfare measurement and the gini index. Valderrama beatriz motivacion inteligente charlie chaplin. The economics of fairness, reciprocity and altruism experimental evidence and new theories ernst fehra university of zurich klaus m. A preference foundation for fehr and schmidts model of. Fehr e schmidt k m 1999 a theory of fairness competition and cooperation the from economics 2001 at ohio state university. Our experiment tests whether subjects are more or less likely to choose a lottery over a fixed payment when others have been assigned either the same lottery or the fixed payment. Probably the simplest model of other regarding preferences that goes beyond pure altruism is the inequality aversion model, popularized in the late 1990s by fehr and schmidt 1999 and bolton and ochenfels 2000. These models modify the standard utility function in the following way. Using a laboratory experiment, we study the predictive power of the fehr schmidt 1999 model of inequity aversion and its robustness to reciprocity and stakes. Schmidtb university of munich and cepr chapter written for the handbook of reciprocity, giftgiving and altruism this version.
Mathias dewatripont, lars peter hansen and stephen j turnovsky 2003. Schmidt, a theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Fehr and schmidt 1999 assume that a player is altruistic towards other players if their material payoffs are below an equitable benchmark, but she feels envy. Effects of affiliation and power motivation arousal on salivary progesterone and testosterone. Inequity aversion and individual behavior in public good. In section 5, we discuss the difference between the distribution of preferences used in fs 1999 and that in fehr and schmidt 2004, fehr et al. Such model intends to capture the idea that people dislike, to a certain extent, unequal outcomes, even if they bene. The aim of this paper is to improve on the model by fehr and schmidt 1999 by developing a nonlinear model. Thus, even if it were true that in general only onethird of the population is motivated by inequality aversion, this motive can have. What are the equilibria in linear publicgood experiments. In 2001, schmidt was awarded the gossen prize in recognition for his contributions to economic research on game theory, contract theory and the economics of fairness.
6 539 1048 152 970 718 1460 1197 970 1357 657 16 774 877 617 379 1019 1270 238 895 1528 1400 1519 769 798 112 1438 39 1145 522 334 88 229 1207 427 761 88 255 406 116 881 1030 304 253 1369 1052